mgt 611 fall 2011( gdb required
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:47 pm
“A”, bought a motor car from “B” at Rs. 4, 00,000 with a belief that car was not seriously accidental. “A” trusted in “B” and bought the car and found that car was perfectly fine. After a time, “C” offered to buy A’s car with the assurance that the car would be in a good condition. C bought A’s car for. 3, 25000. Later, “C” discovered that the car was seriously accidental. He immediately filed a suit against “A” with one of the reasons that he had committed a deliberate fraud with him. While on the other hand, “A” gave explanation that he was also completely unaware about that accident and had not committed any fraud as he found no signs of accident when it was purchased from “B”.
Discussion Questions:
Who was involved in fraudulent activity A, B or C. support your answer with some logical reasons?
Who had misrepresented A, B or C and provide justifications.
In this situation what should C do?
Discussion Questions:
Who was involved in fraudulent activity A, B or C. support your answer with some logical reasons?
Who had misrepresented A, B or C and provide justifications.
In this situation what should C do?